Sunday, March 22, 2026
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Joby Aviation's Electric Skies...
Joby Aviation's Electric Skies
Beyond Drones and Helicopters
Bringing Air Taxis to Your Community
Imagine gliding silently above traffic jams, hearing only wind and distant waves—no rotor roar, no exhaust fumes.
In spring 2026, as America marked its 250th anniversary, Joby Aviation's S4 eVTOL lifted off from Oakland International Airport. Piloted by Andrea Pingitore, the sleek electric air taxi soared over San Francisco Bay, past the Golden Gate Bridge. Its six tilting propellers shifted seamlessly from vertical takeoff to fixed-wing cruise at 200 mph. The 30-minute flight was so quiet that surfers at Steamer's Lane could be heard below—100x quieter than helicopters on takeoff/landing, near-silent in flyover.
Bay Area commutes that once took 2+ hours now shrink to ~30 minutes: clean, emission-free, and efficient.
Just as Tesla redefined electric ground travel with battery innovation and vertical integration, Joby pioneers the electric skies—zero-emission propulsion for urban air mobility.
BTW: This Joby has no relation to the company that makes the cool tripods...
A half decade ago, back in 2021, I published my first article on this Joby VTOL, so I thought it would make sense to see how it's evolved.
Spring 2026. As America marked its 250th anniversary, Joby Aviation's S4 eVTOL—not a drone, but a piloted electric air taxi with 1 pilot + 4 passengers—lifted silently from Oakland International Airport. Pilot Andrea Pingitore guided the craft over San Francisco Bay past the Golden Gate Bridge. Six tilting propellers shifted from vertical takeoff (100x quieter than helicopters) to fixed-wing cruise at 200 mph. The 30-minute flight was so near-silent that surfers at Steamer's Lane could be heard below—unlike noisy, fuel-burning helicopters.
This is no helicopter either: it combines vertical landing with airplane-like efficiency for urban air taxis, slashing Bay Area commutes from hours to minutes. Range: 150 miles. Zero emissions on renewable electricity. Energy use: 0.21–0.23 kWh per passenger-mile—four times better than helicopters, 37% less per trip than a gas car in LA models, though still above ground EVs.
Founded in 2009 by JoeBen Bevirt (unrelated to the separate Joby making GorillaPod tripods and USB flashlights), the company focuses on commercial services via partners like Uber and Delta—not consumer ownership like personal planes or Jetson ONE eVTOLs. Aircraft sell to operators under FAA oversight, with 2026 milestones including the White House eVTOL Integration Pilot Program across 10 states (NY, TX, FL) and first conforming flight tests toward certification.
Tesla parallels are clear: battery-electric propulsion and vertical integration echo Tesla's ground revolution. Elon has teased flying cars; Joby delivers certified reality today, with SuperPilot autonomy advancing. Progress sets up quiet, clean skies.
By 2050, experts expect similar tech evolved to consumer-owned, fully AI-autonomous eVTOLs—personal airborne mobility for all. The future isn't grounded. It's electric and airborne.
Friday, March 20, 2026
Wednesday, March 4, 2026
JAKEeWRAP CyberTruck in the Wild
Oh, The Places You'll Go
JAKEeWRAP CyberTruck Out in the Wild
If I didn't know any better, I would assume that when I look at my CyberTruck with my JAKEeWRAP, (from an outside-the-fishbowl-perspective) that the person who owns it is a show-off, or exhibitionist of sorts. In other words, somebody who is craving attention in a "Look at ME!!!!" kind of way. The truth is the exact opposite. I don't wish to call attention to my CyberTruck at all, but when it looks this OTHERWORLDY there is no avoiding it.
In other words, I came up with the JAKEeWRAP with its crazy geometric lines, and wrapped it this way because I LOVE the way it looks, not because I want to show off (for lack of a better metaphor).
Often times my JAKEeWRAP CyberTruck will be parked somewhere, and out of the corner of my eye, it will notice it, and think, or say: "DaaaaaaYuuuuuM". Sometimes when this occurs, I will take a photo of what I am seeing, and that's exactly what I did with the photo pictured above.
The JAKEeWRAP looks so sharp, like a switch-blade, and it contrasts so much with all other vehicles, including unwrapped CyberTrucks, which is why I say it looks OTHERWORLDLY to me. Like it was designed by aliens, or like somebody traveled 50 years in the future in a Time Machine and brought it back with them, and this photo really captures that notion.
Monday, March 2, 2026
Elon Musk's Real Secret Isn't First Principle's. It's this...
Sunday, February 15, 2026
Elon Musk's $10 Trillion Blueprint
Elon Musk's $10 Trillion Blueprint
From $1.74T Portfolio to Planetary Sensorium
The Inevitable Rise to History's Largest Enterprise
With Elon Musk's SpaceX-xAI merger igniting talk of broader consolidation—including Tesla—Rajesh Iyer's explosive white paper maps the full Musk portfolio (Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, X, Neuralink, Starlink) as a self-reinforcing 'planetary sensorium' poised to hit $10 trillion and surpass the Dutch East India Company as history's largest enterprise.
This is an exclusive story on a white paper you won't find anywhere else. Rajesh Iyer, a brilliant researcher, analyst, and writer, delivers "The $10 Trillion Blueprint: How the Musk Portfolio Will Eclipse the Dutch East India Company to Become the Largest Enterprise in History."
Iyer's thesis: Elon Musk's companies—Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, X, Neuralink, and Starlink—form a unified "planetary sensorium." This integrated stack captures real-world data across vision, motion, language, and emotion, feeding xAI's Colossus cluster to build the ultimate world model.
Current portfolio value: ~$1.74 trillion (as of early 2026).
Projected ceiling: Over $10 trillion in a decade through massive TAM capture:
- Autonomous vehicles: 15% of $10T = $1.5T
- Robotics: 20% of $5T = $1T
- Energy: 10% of $3T = $0.3T
- AI infrastructure: 25% of $2T = $0.5T
- Satellite broadband: 40% of $1T = $0.4T
- Plus 2–3x platform premium
Tesla leads with 9M vehicles generating petabytes of weekly driving data, creating an uncatchable temporal moat. Optimus robots add proprioceptive "tacit knowledge" from physical interaction. Starlink delivers global connectivity patterns. X supplies real-time human discourse. Neuralink captures raw neural intent.
The flywheel is self-funding: Products generate revenue that funds more data, which improves models, which sell more products. No competitor matches this hardware-data-control integration under one authority.
Iyer compares it to the Dutch East India Company (VOC), history's peak enterprise at ~$8 trillion inflation-adjusted. VOC dominated via trade infrastructure and info asymmetry. Musk's sensorium does the same with data network effects—owning the world model makes markets follow.
Risks exist: Regulatory hurdles, execution delays, over-reliance on Tesla's fleet. But the structure favors open societies where authentic data thrives.
Iyer concludes this isn't hype—it's structural inevitability. The Musk portfolio isn't just companies; it's infrastructure that reshapes competition itself.
I am including the first page of the white paper below, tiled "The $10 Trillion Blueprint." For the full white paper click here: [Link to PDF].
Tesla owners and fans: This is the future we're building.
Thursday, February 12, 2026
Elon Musk AI Compute Heads to Space
Elon Musk
AI Compute Heads to Space
In ~30 Months as xAI Undergoes Major Reorganization
In two must-watch recent videos, Elon Musk delivered fresh insights into the explosive future of AI, robotics, and infrastructure—topics with massive implications for Tesla. From orbital data centers solving Earth's power bottlenecks to xAI's strategic overhaul, these discussions underscore how Musk's companies are aligning to accelerate autonomous driving, humanoid robots, and energy abundance.
The Dwarkesh Patel Podcast: "In 36 Months, the Cheapest Place to Put AI Will Be Space" (Feb 5, 2026)
In a wide-ranging interview with Dwarkesh Patel, Musk zeroed in on the hard limits of terrestrial AI scaling: electricity. While chip production grows exponentially, electrical output outside China remains largely flat, creating an imminent bottleneck.
Amazingly Insightful Video on Tesla's Future
Amazingly Insightful Video on Tesla's Future
It's rare, but I love coming across videos from really intelligent people who discuss Tesla's value proposition in a unique way, and this is certainly a video that meets that criteria. I HIGHLY recommend watching this short video if you want to understand Tesla's future. In particular, he discusses Tesla's competitive advantage over Nvidia's "Alpamayo", which is fascinating...
Thursday, January 29, 2026
Future Tesla Design Reference CyberVAN by JAKE EHRLICH
The Future of TESLA
“We will transition the Cybertruck to a fully autonomous line. There is obviously a market there for cargo delivery—localized cargo delivery. An autonomous Cybertruck could be useful for that.”
—Elon Musk (Q4 Earnings Call)
CyberVAN
ONE MORE THANG
Steampunk Design
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
FAKE TESLA NEWS!!!! How an AI Fake News Video Almost Fooled Me And Why It’s Getting Dangerous
FAKE TESLA NEWS!!!!
How an AI Fake News Video Almost Fooled Me
And Why AI is Getting Dangerous
I have a VERY SCARY story to share with you: AI is getting dangerously scary!!!! I have to let you know, I am beyond embarrassed by this story. In 18 years of blogging, I don't recall EVER having or needing to write a redaction, so this is a first for me.
Two days ago I noticed an interesting YouTube video with a sensational title so I watched it and thought it was convincing. I didn't bother fact-checking it, as it seemed so well researched to me. I published an article titled “How California Tried and Failed to Destroy Tesla’s Fremont Factory.”
It was based almost entirely on a YouTube video narrated by an attractive “reporter” named Sophia Miller claiming Fremont was shutting down.
I fell for this fake news and assumed it was breaking news, that I had not heard about yet, and thus, I wanted to get the story out ASAP. Grok even proofread the piece for me, and didn't bother pointing out it was highly inaccurate FAKE NEWS...
I turns out Sophia Miller doesn’t exist. She’s 100% AI-generated. The channel pumps out synthetic “news” videos daily, many outright false or wildly exaggerated.
Why does YouTube allow this channel to publish FAKE AI News that is so misleading, without making the channel divulge up from that it is AI? What is the motive of the channel to produce such fake news? My best guess is their strategy is to combine real news with fake news that it highly sensationalized and exaggerated as a form of clickbait, so they can make money off of YouTube monetization.
For the record, the Tesla Fremont factory is not closing—it’s running full-tilt, building refreshed Model 3s and starting Optimus robot production.
I deleted the article the moment I realized, I had been fooled.
This isn’t just embarrassing; it’s a warning.
In 2026, AI can now create:
-Photorealistic video faces that never age or blink wrong.
-Perfect American-accent voice clones.
-Convincing scripts laced with just enough truth to pass basic fact-checks.
-One fake video + one careless writer = instant misinformation spread to thousands.
We’re past the era where you can trust a video because “it looks or seems real.”
Lesson I learned the hard way: always search the presenter’s name, reverse-image the thumbnail, and verify claims with primary sources (Tesla.com, SEC filings, local reporting) before hitting publish.
I got played by pixels. Don’t let it happen to you.
Stay skeptical out there.
In case you are interested, the way I figured out it was fake news is from watching this excellent YouTube video from Will @ TeslaJigsaw, which is an excellent Tesla YouTube channel:
Thursday, January 15, 2026
Fascinatingly Bizarre CyberTruck Video
Fascinatingly Bizarre CyberTruck Video
This is one of the most bizarre video's I have ever watched in my life—in a good way. Instead of spelling it out for your, I just recommend you watch it:
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Tesla will stop selling FSD after February 14, 2026
Elon Musk Announces
Tesla will stop selling FSD after February 14, 2026
Elon Musk tweeted today that Tesla will stop selling FSD after February 14, 2026, and will only be available as a monthly subscription thereafer.
What exactly does this mean and what are the ramifications? The greatest question is "Once FSD goes unsupervised, how will this effect customer vehicles that purchased FSD?"
It's pretty likely that once Tesla solves FSD "Unsupervised", it will offer two tiers of Subscription as follows:
1. FSD (Supervised). I would imagine Tesla will continue offering supervised FSD for $99 a month. I assume this would work similarly to the way supervised FSD works today, but the driver would be required to sit in the front seat of their Tesla, and supervise the vehicle. This might allow drivers to text on their phone while driving, if the car senses it's safe to do so, but if not, the vehicle will naaag the user and tell them to take over.
2. FSD (Unsupervised). This next level would allow users to sleep in the back seat of a Tesla if they want, as it would require no supervision, and I would expect Tesla to charge $299 per month for this service, and if you purchase this as a subcription that is pre-paid 6 months in advance the price would drop down to $249 per month.
There is also some fascinating speculation that Tesla might offer a per mile subscription as well for Unsupervised FSD, which is covered in the video below:
From what I can tell, for users who pre-paid the $8-15K for FSD, which is currently $8K, once Tesla offers Unsupervised FSD, they will get full FSD (Unsupervised) at no additional charge. Thus, if they start charing $3,600 a year for FSD Unsupervised in the not so distant future then vehicles where owners who purchased the $8K FSD package, might end up saving some good money if they keep their cars for many years.
Transportation as a Service
Will Tesla Keep Selling Cars To The Public?
One of the great questions is, "Will Tesla even keep selling cars to the public?" I think the answer to this question has to do with what Tesla feels they can get away with. I think in a vacuum, if Tesla could figure out a way to stop selling vehicles to customers they would take it and only make vehicles that go directly into their RoboTaxi fleet. In other words, why would they want to make a Standard RWD or AWD Tesla Model X they can sell to a customer for $40-50K, when they can build the same car, and rent it out by the mile and in the first 4 years generate 10 times the amount of money?
The only variable that will likely stop Tesla from doing this, ironically, is competitors. If a company like LUCID or Rivian, or even Toyota, can figure out how to make vehicles that can offers a form of unsupervised FSD-like performance, that might force Tesla to compete in that space, but then again, perhaps not. Either way it will be very interesting to see where this all goes.
As I have mentioned before, I strongly believe the following:
1. Tesla has had the entire automotive industry in check mate since 2017, but very few people realized it.
2. Elon directed Franz and his design team in 2023: "I want you to stop all meaningful product development on the Model 3, Y, S, X and CyberTruck, and simply finish up the Roadster. Then I want you to focus 100% of your energy on developing they next generation of Tesla vehicles that lack steering wheels and front facing seats, which include CyberVAN, and new form-factors, including the CyberTaxi which still will have front facing seats, but lack a steering wheel.
I believe that the ONLY new model that will be introduced in the future that will include a steering wheel will be the new Tesla Roadster.
Sunday, January 11, 2026
Ferrari Pursangue v.Tesla Model Y Performance
More is Less
Ferrari Pursangue v.
Tesla Model Y Performance
Ferrari’s Purosangue—translated as “thoroughbred”—from Italian carries a name that promises purebred Italian passion. In reality, it delivers a $524,000, 715-hp, naturally aspirated 6.5-liter V12 SUV burdened by complexity, weight (over 4,800 lbs), and old-school engineering.
Ferrari Purosangue looks like a cheap mini station wagon
I find the styling of the Ferrari Purosangue to be extremely unappealing, as it looks like modern Toyota Prius (pictured below) copy, with a wagon back and Ferrari badges slapped all over it!?!! I think the Ferrari looks really stupid on both the outside and inside, and is a HORRIBLE investment for people who love wasting money... A CyberTruck destroys this car in every way possible, for 20% or less of the cost...Frankly, I think the lines on the Toyota look better than the Ferrari's lines...
Modern Toyota Prius has better lines than $500K Ferrari
I would say the Ferrari name of "Purosangue", which is not memorable in any way, nor is it even pronounceable as a name, pretty much sums up the vehicle, if you ask me. I think if Ferrari named this vehicle "The Rube Goldberg" model, it would have been more accurate and appealing. The supreme irony—at least in my mind—is the sales tax on the Ferrari is around the same price as the total cost of the Model Y Performance!?!!
Brooks Weisblat from DragTimes put both cars to the test. The Ferrari Purosangue runs 0–60 mph in 3.55 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11.43 seconds at 123 mph. Respectable numbers—until you compare them to the Tesla Model Y Performance.
For just $58,000, the Model Y Performance delivers 510 horsepower, instant torque, and a 0–60 mph in 3.49 seconds, with a quarter-mile in 11.4 seconds at 121 mph. In acceleration and real-world usability, the Tesla holds its own or edges ahead, especially considering traction and launch consistency.
Brooks does an amazing job of comparing and contrasting the $500,000 Ferrari to the $60,000 Tesla Model S Performance model, which basically smokes the Ferrari—badly.
This video clearly illustrates why Tesla had the entire automotive industry in check mate. For instance, the $60K Tesla has FSD built-in, and the Ferrari has none. The Ferrari Purosangue has an interior that looks like the Goodwill blew up, and the Tesla has a zen-like ultra simple interior. The Ferrari has 18 cubic feet of cargo area in the back, and the Model Y has 72 cubic feet of cargo space. I rest my case, your honor...
Saturday, January 10, 2026
JAKEeWRAP 3D Rear Pyramid Window Sail Panel
Real World
JAKEeWRAP
3D Rear Pyramid Window Sail Panel
If you are a regular reader of Jake's Tesla World you are likely aware of the long saga on how I finally brought my JAKEeWRAP CyberTruck to reality. One of the latest details I experimented with was trying to figure out how to make the pyramid rear sail panel actually look like a glass window. My original spec called for simply using STEK glossy PPF, which looked great, and I coupled this by having Jay's Tint Shop in Kirkland, Washington tint my windows, as well as black out my window sills.









































